CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Task-based instruction (TBI) is
frequently promoted as an effective teaching approach, superior to
‘traditional’ methods, and soundly based in theory and research. The approach
is often justified by the claim that linguistic regularities are acquired through
‘noticing’ during communicative activity, and should therefore be addressed
primarily by incidental ‘focus on form’ during task performance. However, this
claim is based on unproved hypotheses, and there is no compelling empirical
evidence for the validity of the model. Many advocates of TBI reject proactive
syllabus design on doctrinaire grounds, while commonly misrepresenting
‘traditional’ classroom practice. While TBI may successfully develop learners’
command of what is known, it is considerably less effective for the systematic
teaching of new language. This is especially so where time is limited and
out-of-class exposure unavailable, thus making heavily task-based programmes
inappropriate for most of the world's language learners. The polarization of
meaning-based and form-based instruction is unconstructive, and reflects a
recurrent pattern of damaging ideological swings in language teaching theory
and practice.
This paper examines a number of
claims that are commonly made for, or in connection with, task-based
instruction in foreign-language learning. I am using the term ‘task-based
instruction’ (‘TBI’) in a strictly circumscribed sense, following. That is to
say, I am concerned solely with an instructional approach that makes
meaning-centred tasks the ‘central planning tool of the syllabus’ or ‘the basis
for an entire language curriculum’, while rejecting alternative or
complementary approaches to syllabus design. It is no part of my purpose to
cast doubt on the pedagogic utility of tasks communicative or otherwise as
such. Nor do I wish to question the value of the large body of task-directed
research both inside and outside the TBI framework which has contributed
substantially to our repertoire of pedagogic resources and to our understanding
of second language acquisition.
A.
Definition
of Topics
Ø Based on Oxford dictionary, task (noun) is an activity which is designed
to help achieve a particular learning goal, especially in language teaching.
Ø Based on Oxford dictionary, based (adjective) is containing something as an
important part or feature.
Ø Based on Oxford dictionary,
instruction (noun) is detailed
information on how to do or use something.
It can be
assumed that “Task Based Instruction”
focuses
on
the use of authentic language and on asking students to do meaningful tasks
using the target language.
Based on Encarta, task is a piece of work or an
assignment especially one that is important or difficult. Instruction is a
spoken or written statement of what must be done especially delivered formally,
with a official authority, or as an order.
B. Problems
Formulation
1. Task based instruction
2. General principle and characteristic
of Task based instruction
3.
Component of Task based instruction
4. Roles of Task based instruction
5. Six types of task
6.
Advantages
and Disadvantages of Task based instruction
CHAPTER
II
DISCUSSION
1.
Task Based Instruction
While there is a good deal of
variation among experts on how to describe or define task, Peter Skehan’s
(1998a: 95) concept of task seem to chapter the essentials. He defines task as
an activity in which
Ø Meaning is primary
Ø There is some communication problem
to solve
Ø There is some sort of relationship
to comparable real-world activities
Ø Task completion has some priority,
and
Ø The assessment of the task is in
term of outcome.
A task is really a special form of technique. In some cases,
task and technique may be synonymous (a problem-solving task/technique; a role
play task/technique, for example). But in other cases a task may be comprised
of several techniques (for example, a problem-solving task that includes, let’s
say, grammatical explanation, teacher-initiated questions, and a specific
turn-taking procedure). Tasks are usually “bigger” in their ultimate ends than
techniques.
Task based instruction is not a new method. Rather, it puts
task at the center of one’s methodological focus. It views the learning process
as a set of communicative tasks that are directly linked to the curricular
goals they serve, the purposes of which extend beyond the practice of language
for its own sake. Research on task based learning (see Skehan 1998a, 1998b,
Skehan & Foster 1997, 1999; Williams & Burden 1997; Willis 1996, among
others) has attempted to identify types of tasks that enhance learning (such as
open-ended, structured, teacher-fronted, small group, and pair work), to define
task-specific learner factors (for example, roles, proficiency levels, and
styles), and to examine teacher roles and other variables that contribute to
successful achievement of objectives.
2. GENERAL
PRINCIPLES AND CHARACTERISTICS OF TASK-BASED INSTRUCTION
Ø Task based
instruction is based on the use of tasks as the core unit of planning and
instruction in language teaching.
Ø Task that
involve real communication are essential for language learning.
Ø Learners
learn language by interacting communicatively and purposefully while engaged in
the activities and tasks.
Ø The focus is
on process rather than product.
Ø Language
that is meaningful to the learner supports the learning process.
Ø Activities and
tasks of a task based syllabus are sequenced according to difficulty.
Ø The
difficulty of a task depends on a range of factors including the previous
experience of the learner, the complexity of the task, the language required to
undertake the task, and the
degree of support available (Richards and Rodgers 2001).
Ø Errors are not necessarily the result of bad learning, but are part of the
natural process of interlanguage
forms gradually moving towards target forms (Ellis 1994).
3. COMPONENTS
OF THE TASK-BASED INSTRUCTION FRAMEWORK
This section
will illustrate the basic procedures of the three phases in task-based instruction:
Pre-task
|
Introduction to topic and
task: Teacher explores the topic with the class, highlights useful words and
phrases, helps students understand task instructions and prepare.
|
Task Cycle
|
Task: Students do the
task, in pairs or small groups. Teacher monitors from a distance.
Planning: Students
prepare to report to the whole class ( orally or in writing) how they did the task, what they decided or
discovered.
Report: Some groups
present their reports to the class, or exchange written reports and compare
results.
|
Language Focus
|
Analysis: Students examine
and discuss specific features of the text or transcript of the recording.
Practice: Teacher conducts
practice or new words, phrases and patterns occurring in the data, either
during or after the analysis (Willis 1996: 38).
|
4. ROLE OF TASK BASED INSTRUCTION
1. Teacher roles:
a.
Selector and
sequencer of tasks: A central role of the teacher is in selecting, adapting,
and/or creating themselves and then forming these in keeping with learner
needs, interests, and language skill level.
b.
Preparing
learners for tasks: Some sort of pretask preparation or cuing is important for
learners. Such activities might include topic introduction, clarifying task
instructions, helping students learn or recall useful words and phrases to
facilitate task accomplishment, and providing partial demonstration of task procedure.
c.
Consciousness-raising:
The teacher employs a variety of form-focusing techniques, including
attention-focusing pretask activities, text exploration, guided exposure to
parallel tasks, and use of highlighted material.
2.
Learner
Roles:
a.
Group Participant:
Many tasks will be done in pairs or small groups. For students more accustomed
to whole-class and/or individual work, this may require some adaptation.
b.
Monitor: In
TBI, tasks are employed as a means of facilitating learning. Class activities have
to be designed so that students have the opportunity to notice how language is
used in communication. Learners themselves need to “attend” not only to the
message in task work, but also to the form in which such messages typically
come packed.
c.
Risk-taker
and innovator: Many tasks will require learners to create and interpret
messages for which they lack full linguistic resources and prior experience. In
fact, this is said to be the point of such tasks. The skills of guessing from
linguistic and contextual clues, asking for clarification, and consulting with
other learners may need to be developed (Richards and Rodgers 2001).
5. SIX TYPES OF
TASK
The
classification will help to generate a variety of tasks on whatever topic is
selected. Simple tasks may consist of one type only, such as listing; more
complex tasks may incorporate two or more types, such as, listing then
comparing lists. Problem solving may include listing, comparing and ranking.
Six types of task, which will be outlined, are also classified as “closed” and
“open” tasks. “Closed” tasks are ones that are highly structured and have very
specific goals, for example, Work in pairs to find seven differences between
these two pictures. The information is restricted. There is only one
possible outcome. Most comparing tasks are like this. “Open” tasks are ones
that are more loosely structured with a less specific goal, for example,
comparing memories of childhood journeys, or exchanging anecdotes on a theme.
Open tasks are considered more creative. Other types of tasks come midway
between “closed” and “open” (Please see appendices for examples of task types).
Six types of task are:
LISTING:
|
Processes → Brainstorming, fact-finding.
|
ORDERING AND SORTING:
|
Processes → Sequencing, ranking, categorizing,
classifying.
|
COMPARING:
|
Processes → Matching, finding similarities, finding differences.
|
PROBLEM SOLVING:
|
Processes → Analysing real or hypothetical situations, reasoning, and decision
making.
|
SHARING PERSONAL EXPERIENCES:
|
Processes → Narrating, describing, exploring and explaining attitudes, opinions,
reactions.
|
CREATIVE TASKS:
|
Processes → Brainstorming, fact-finding, ordering and sorting, comparing, problem
solving and many others (Willis 1996).
|
6. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF TASK BASED INSTRUCTION
Advantages
Ø The students
are free of language control.
Ø A natural
context is developed from the students’ experience
Ø The language
arises from their needs.
Ø The students
will have much more exposure to language
Ø Students
spend a lot of time communicating.
Disadvantages
Ø The weaknesses of task-based learning lie not so much in the potential
effectiveness of this type of instructional content but in problems of
implementing the instruction.
Ø Task-based learning requires a high level of creativity and initiative on
the part of the teacher. If the teachers are limited to more traditional roles
or do not have time and resources to implement task-based teaching; this type
of teaching may be impossible.
Ø Requires resources beyond the textbooks and related materials usually found
in language classrooms.
Ø Task-based instruction is not teacher-centered; instead, it requires
individual and group responsibility and commitment on the part of students. If
students are notably lacking in these qualities, task-based instruction may
indeed be difficult to implement.
Ø Some learners revert to mother tongue when things get difficult or if the
group feels impatient.
Ø There is a risk for learners to achieve fluency at the expense of accuracy.
Ø There is naturally more concern for use of lexis and lexical chunks than
for grammar and grammatical accuracy.
Ø Evaluation of task-based learning can be difficult.
CHAPTER III
CONCLUSION
Task-based
instruction (TBI) is frequently promoted as an effective teaching approach,
superior to ‘traditional’ methods, and soundly based in theory and research.
The approach is often justified by the claim that linguistic regularities are
acquired through ‘noticing’ during communicative activity, and should therefore
be addressed primarily by incidental ‘focus on form’ during task performance.
Task Based Instruction focuses on
the use of authentic language and on asking students to do meaningful tasks
using the target language.